Fertile Free Fuels for Plutonium and Minor Actinides Burning in LWRs
نویسندگان
چکیده
The feasibility of using various uranium-free fuels for plutonium incineration in present light water reactors is investigated. Two major categories of inert matrix fuels are studied: composite ceramic fuel particles dispersed in another ceramic matrix (CERCER) and ceramic fuel particles dispersed into a metallic matrix (CERMET). In the category of CERCER, the current world wide research effort has been focused on three matrix candidates: (1) Spinel (MgAl2O4); (2) CeO2, and (3) MgO. In contrast, there are still no emerging commonly accepted matrix candidates for a CERMET. The fuel may consist of plutonium, minor actinides (MA), or both which are termed trans-uranium (TRU) fuel. The transmutation rate and the transmuted fraction of initial loadings are calculated using CASMO-4. Different inert matrix fuels have similar burning abilities in terms of how much and how fast the Pu, MA or TRU can be burned, and they are all superior to the mixed UO2-PuO2 (MOX) fuel. From this point of view, there is no good reason to favor one inert matrix over another. The burning rates in terms of kg/(GWe-Year) of different inert matrix fuels are quite stable with regard to changing the moderation level (or H/HM ratio) in the core. Changing initial loadings and changing power densities can not result in large change in the burned percentage of initial loadings and burning rate. Lack of U-238 and the neutronic characteristics of plutonium lead to degradation of safety related kinetic parameters. It is found that various inert matrix fuels have similar values for the Doppler coefficient, moderator temperature coefficient, void coefficient, boron worth and effective delayed
منابع مشابه
Mass Balance of the Pu and Minor Actinides Recycling Metal Fuel System
The mass flow of Plutonium and minor actinides is calculated for a future LWR-FBR fuel cycle model, in which a certain scale of power generation by LWRs is continued for a long period before the replacement by FBRs begins. The burnup of the LWR spent fuel is considered to be higher than the current standard. It is assumed that all the Plutonium and minor actinides recovered from LWRs are kept a...
متن کاملمحاسبات مصرف سوخت و پارامترهای نوترونیک مربوط به رآکتورهای آب سنگین تحقیقاتی با سوخت اورانیوم- توریوم توسط کد MCNPX
One of the main characteristics of heavy water research reactors is their high production of plutonium. This work demonstrates the possibility of reduction of plutonium production and other actinides in heavy water research reactors. Among the many ways for reducing plutonium production in a heavy water reactor, in this research, changing the fuel from natural uranium to thorium-uranium mixed f...
متن کاملActinide Burning in a Standard Pressurized Water Reactor
This study investigates actinide burning in a standard lattice PWR. It assumes that after the first loading of depleted uranium, plutonium and minor actinides, only the fission products are removed and only depleted uranium and the plutonium/minor actinide mixture are added. The relative concentrations of plutonium and minor actinide feed are always maintained the same as PWR discharge fuel aft...
متن کاملEvaluation of Alternative Partitioning/transmutation Scenarios Using Transmutation in Light-water Reactors (lwrs)
Previous Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative (AFCI) studies were made to assess the effects of the existing accumulation of LWR spent fuel in the United States on the capability to partition/transmute actinides using existing and advanced LWRs. The concept of treating the “oldest fuel first” indicated that significant advantages could be gained in both partitioning, transmutation, and in overall cos...
متن کاملAssessment of a French scenario with the INPRO methodology
This paper presents the French contribution to the Joint Study of the IAEA’s International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO). It concerns the application of the INPRO methodology to a French scenario, on the transition from present LWRs to EPRs in a first phase and to 4th generation fast reactors in a second phase during the 21st century. The scenario also considers...
متن کامل